Wednesday 25 July 2012

Ancient Light

A few weeks back, I posted about the new John Banville which Waterstones had sent me a copy to review.  Anyway, though my review's up on their website, I thought I'd post it here too.
 
“Billie Gray was my best friend and I fell in love with my mother”. This is the third novel that Banville has written about Alexander Cleave, now an aging actor reflecting on his coming of age. I haven’t read the previous novels but this book stands on its own and has enough references to previous events to give context.

The novel focuses on an affair that Alexander had with a married woman, Mrs. Gray, when he was 15 and she 20 years his senior. Recollections of this affair are interspersed with a contemporary story of a role he is asked to play.
 
The stronger elements of the book are the descriptions of this relationship, his boyish reaction (often sulky and petulant) and Mrs. Gray’s response (sometimes lover/sometimes mother). The relationship is described as wholly positive, and is in fact the benchmark against which his subsequent relationships are measured. This, despite the negative impact on his friendship with Billie, the potential response from his community (unspecified but clearly a small town where scandal would be both welcomed and ruinous) and the impact on his academic achievement. I couldn’t help but wonder if a similar story could be told with the genders reversed, though to be fair, Banville, through Alexander, raises this question himself.
 
The characters are strongly drawn, not just the main players but also peripheral characters. My favourite was Trevor the Trinity man, a drunk who’s on and off the wagon, an “aristocrat of the species”. This is perhaps an idealised version of a street drunk but it’s written with tremendous warmth. This does, however, highlight one of my criticisms of the book, namely that parts of it are idealised and unrealistic. For example, the impact of the relationship with Gray would surely have had negative aspects, while the description of Trevor is more that of an eccentric than the alcoholic he clearly is.
 
The physical descriptions of people are very visual which really brings them to life – Billie Stryker “might have been assembled from a collection of cardboard boxes of varying sizes that were first left out in the rain and then piled soggily any old way one on top of the other”.
 
The language throughout the book is elaborate but can be diverting. I found myself occasionally losing track whilst being taken down a rather lengthy descriptive passage. That said, this forces you to re-read certain passages and to understand the atmosphere that the author is no doubt seeking to create. Once you get used to the style, there are some absolutely beautiful turns of phrase - it’s definitely a book where you occasionally stop to re-read a section just for the pleasure of the language.
 
There are clear references to loss, both people and places – a daughters suicide, Mrs. Gray a mere memory, the past a place where things were simpler.
 
Overall, a beautifully written book for old friends of Alexander Cleave and fans of characters – both flawed and quirky.
  

Tuesday 17 July 2012

If This is Home by Stuart Evers


Hot off the press....conspiracy theories abounded at tonight's discussion of 'If This is Home.' Caroline introduced us (well, me at least) to the literary tool of the 'unreliable narrator.' After 20 minutes of attempting to defend the book against Anna & I's accusations that it was a load of old tripe, she advanced the interesting theory that the entire thing was a figment of Mark's imagination and that he is in fact the murderer. This made her like it a lot more than when she had read it to start with! Jill and Judith both professed love/hate relationships with it, enjoying the descriptions of frustrated teenagers in a small town near Manchester, but finding some of the characters either under-developed or very unlikeable. The American locations were generally felt to be unconvincing, although Caroline thought that the men's behaviour at Valhalla was depressingly realistic. Anna & I remained entrenched in our positions that the plot was full of holes, the characters were horrible and the relationships made little sense. Unresolved questions include: why did Mark need to change his identity? Why did he change from fairly normal to undiagnosed psychopath? (unreliable narrator theory helps here...) Why did Bethany's father react to his return so angrily (if he was just the innocent boyfriend) or so evenly (if he was his daughter's killer)? What was the deal with Ferne getting all over intimate after 1 chat in the bar? Why did he keep going on about O'Neill as if he was in love with him, or at least suffering from an extended teenage crush? why did Mark's mum leave? do his parents seriously think his resentment at the prospect of another baby caused a miscarriage & ended the marriage? Jill, Judith & Caroline, feel free to balance out my very negative spin on it all!

2 other contributions by e-mail....


Was a bit underwhelmed by the book. Felt the jumping about only masked a not very gripping story. Who was o'neill and what exactly was their relationship? Did I miss how they got together? Why would she have gone with daniel other than to set up the red herring and, not wishing to stereotype, would anyone but a saint, which he wasn't portrayed as, really have walked away that calmly? Otherwise I did think her voice in his head was well done and the relationship with Ferne perhaps better drawn than that with O'neill and realistic. After all the agonising the end was a bit rushed with the actual murder very sketchy. Would like to know what everyone thought of the episode in Vegas considering they were offering 'anything you desire' what did they expect? None of this is very coherent or grammatical when I'm criticising other writing so I'll give him 5.5 for being able to string a sentence together!



I am afraid I did not like it at all. The main problem I had was that it just did not hang together for me. What was the big mystery he was trying to find out? If this was that she was not going to New York after all it was all very poorly executed, as her own narrative clearly states that she was. Did she let him find out she wasn't going to go so that he could move on with his life - if so why did the friend think she wasn't. Also, to follow this line you have to believe it ghosts and i don't.
Other questions I had -
Why did he change his identity? Was the author tried to kid us into thinking that he had more to hide? (there is also some hint, never explained, that the police officer thinks more than he is saying)
What on earth was all that rubbish about the blind eating?
Has any stranger rapist ever just laid down beside the victim and waited for the police?
I thought the description of his relationship with Oneil was unconvincing and I am not sure I ever really understood what they were doing in Las Vegas. In fact I thought that section was just tacky and over complicated. The idea that someone with a PHD in group behaviour would be interested in how men behave when in the company of women dressed in bunny suits is just nonsense - I think we already know that one.
On the plus side I thought the description of his relationship with his father and the couple of scenes between the two of them were poignant and nicely written as were some of the early descriptions between Mark and Bethany and between Bethany and her father. Also some nice descriptions of the town.
So for me - not well written, poor plot, unconvincing characters and interplay between them, and elements that were not believable.
I am afraid I am going to give it a paltry 4. Be interested to hear what others think - perhaps I would have been talked up?

Our scores
Jill - 5
Anna - 5
Caroline - 7.5
Annie - 3
Judith - 6
Carole - 4
Chris 5.5

Monday 16 July 2012

Case Histories

If I can shamelessly intrude, I just wanted to report on having thoroughly enjoyed something that you all probably read years and years ago, Case Histories by Kate Atkinson. It was interesting to see a literary fiction writer cross over into crime fiction and do a great job giving the genre some proper emotional weight. It reminded me, on this point, of Atwood's "transgressions" into science fiction (am I allowed to speak of this genre here?). Anyway, I wrote a bit more over here ...

Link to Strange News